Hello! Community Page
- tropophilia.com Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I'd love to get one, but they won't sell them in Canada yet.
- According to the building manager, this isn’t really necessary: it’s easier and more efficient for the maintenance guy to add loads of sawdust all at once in the basement..It looks like it really...
- What do you make of the effect of Twitter, YouTube, etc. on the political debate over the situation in Iran? I agree with you that the impact of modern technology on how we observe--I wouldn't...
- Interesting, as are all progressive or "forward-thinking" ideas, but I wouldn't get my hopes up. New Urbanism seems as far-fetched an idea in our society as electric cars,...
- My point is not that low income people don't already live in high-density urban areas. (Though there's a great deal of inequity in the supply of basic services to those areas, like grocery...
Tropophilia
the love of change.
Last month John McCain made a campaign promise that, if elected, he would champion a $300 million prize to develop an inexpensive and powerful automotive battery that could âleapfrogâ current available batteries. While the announcement garnered some press coverage, it was
... Continue reading »
11 months ago
I like that McCain's signal with this prize idea is at least "I think these technologies matter," or "we need next generation battery technology to move forward on clean energy for automobiles," but the difference between the space X-Prize and this idea is (and this is arguable, but I think it's true) that nobody needs to light a fire under would-be battery inventors. I think the pace of change in aerospace technology HAD declined a bit prior to the X-Prize, and you're absolutely right that it produced a great deal of positive investment well beyond the prize amount. Whether that's needed here is unclear.
Bottom line: I'm not opposed to the battery prize per se, I'm just not convinced that it's necessary and I worry that it'll be seen as the end-all, be-all. In other words, I fear the attitude of: "we can't make any progress on clean energy until somebody solves that battery problem...guess we should go drill for oil off the coast."
As an interesting corrollary, many in philanthropy are aflutter about "prize philanthropy" exemplified by the x-prize. It's a cool model for change and something to watch for. The X-Prize Foundation, the organization that administered the space x prize, has a few other open "contests":
"The $10 million X PRIZE for Genomics prize purse will be awarded to the first Team that can build a device and use it to sequence 100 human genomes within 10 days or less, with an accuracy of no more than one error in every 100,000 bases sequenced, with sequences accurately covering at least 98% of the genome, and at a recurring cost of no more than $10,000 per genome."
"The Google Lunar X PRIZE is a $30 million international competition to safely land a robot on the surface of the Moon, travel 500 meters over the lunar surface, and send images and data back to the Earth."
And the still-developing Progressive Automotive X Prize: "To inspire a new generation of viable, super-efficient vehicles that help break our addiction to oil and stem the effects of climate change."
11 months ago
The partisan in me wants to think that this is another way to tell the American public that the electric car is some sort of far-away dream when they could be mass-produced by 2009 if misinformation about their abilities didn't deflate potential demand. Tesla will have a $50,000 sedan by 2010, and if rising gas prices fuel demand that price will go down. What does a prize really do aside from deny the progress we've already made?